A Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Treatments in Managing Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Original Article

Authors

  • Sayyeda Aisha Bahar
  • Aqsa Amjad
  • Adil Jan
  • Asif Wakil
  • Saad Manan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69837/pjammr.v2i01.30

Keywords:

Systematic & individual, IV therapy

Abstract

Abstract

Background: In cirrhotics, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a potentially fatal illness that requires immediate antibiotic administration. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the effectiveness of IV and oral antibiotics in patients with SBP.

Objectives: We compared the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of oral vs intravenous antibiotic therapy for the treatment of SBP using data from a retrospective cohort analysis.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study

Place and duration of study: A tertiary care Hospital in Peshawar from Jan 2022 to Jan 2023

Methods:At Tertiary Care Hospital Peshawar, a Retrospective Cohort Study was conducted including all patients diagnosed with SBP between January 2022 and January 2023. The patients were split into two groups based on the kind of antibiotics administered: Group B: patients in need of ampicillin, cephalosporines, or IV IV therapy; Group A: patients on oral antibiotics and ciprofloxacin/cotrimoxazole with norfloxacin (patient 44). Patients who were eighteen years of age or older were eligible for inclusion. Based on an ascitic PMN cell count of ≥250 cells/mm³ and positive bacterial cultures, they were diagnosed with hospital-acquired SBP. Secondary peritonitis and serious co-morbidities requiring non-study antibiotic therapy were excluded criteria.

Results:Group B, which received metronidazole orally, had an 85% resolution rate and an in-hospital mortality rate.The highest mortality rate and length of hospital stay were determined to be 10% and 7 ±3 days, respectively. With a 90% resolution rate and a roughly 8% overall mortality rate, Group B only needed to stay in the hospital for 10 (±4) days. 15% recurrences in Group A Group B: 12 percent recurrences

Conclusion:Oral antibiotics are statistically no different from IV in terms of mortality, length of stay, or other outcomes when used to treat SBP. The proven outcomes back up the introduction of oral therapy for individuals who qualify in order to improve adherence and save costs.

Keywords: Oral antibiotics, Systematic & individual, IV therapy

Downloads

Published

05-01-2024

How to Cite

Sayyeda Aisha Bahar, Aqsa Amjad, Adil Jan, Asif Wakil, & Saad Manan. (2024). A Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Treatments in Managing Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: Original Article . Pakistan Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 2(01), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.69837/pjammr.v2i01.30